🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage could be the perfect choice for a bold scary movie about the biblical figure, though not for the motivations many audiences might assume. Actually, Cage doesn't even act as the central religious figure in The Carpenter’s Son: his character is referred to merely as a craftsman. The actor is cast as a father figure in this story, striving to maintain his beliefs while the teenage character (portrayed by Noah Jupe), his teenage foster child, begins to exhibit supernatural abilities. The explanation it's challenging to picture any other prominent performer playing this part is that while his character is weighed down with multiple difficulties, Nicolas Cage appears almost emotionally confident that this gloomy, somber little movie is deserving of his effort.

Cage's Latest Projects

Nicolas Cage has been spending that time more carefully lately. He still makes more films than the majority of regular audiences could possibly view — as an illustration, are you aware that the actor has made three distinct Westerns over the last few years? — but he also mixes in esteemed A24/Neon gigs for example Dream Scenario, Pig, and Longlegs. This new film sounds like in that category, in that it’s not strictly scary, likely to stir debate, and takes a campy-sounding description quite seriously.

The Film's Storyline and Direction

Regrettably, filmmaker the director does not justify viewer engagement. The Carpenter’s Son starts from a compellingly nomadic context, marketed as based on an unknown scripture concerning the early years of Jesus. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and their child move frequently, afraid of doctrinal intolerance or suspicion regarding The Boy’s strange powers. “Disaster trails us,” Cage sadly observes. That continues as evil influences focus on the family where they currently live, beginning with that familiar Biblical temptation for the son.

At times, the movie mirrors an demonic possession-type horror film, though none of the lead characters are directly possessed. On the contrary, they become progressively isolated from each other, while these entities affect a resident female (the actress, listed as “The Stranger”) that the son connects to, and provides each character unsettling premonitions of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter in particular grapples with his role within the plot, sometimes berating his child who mystifies him.

Debate and Sensitivity

The subject matter is likely to stir disagreement, and the director approaches it with a lot of delicacy — excessive, perhaps. The concept of a teenage boy confronted with his future martyrdom and lured by unknown powers is truly scary, but the filmmaker may be wary of seeming gratuitous and anxious to telegraph his aims, therefore he regularly falls back on dimly foreboding visuals. Characters brood incessantly — FKA Twigs, who demonstrated real promise in another movie, of all things — cedes her acting to her Mother Mary cloak, sometimes broken up by some disturbing frightening scenes.

The Star's Portrayal and Film's Flaws

Simultaneously, Cage toy with precisely the type of exaggerated performance that those who enjoy his campier roles might be looking for. An instance (also included) in promotional material where Cage flips out and yells “My belief is broken!” Should such of theatrical release is a component of a religious scary film, possibly a more boldly ridiculous style would take better advantage of the actor's readiness to exaggerate as required. Instead, the film echoes the poorer direct-to-video films the actor filmed over the last decade — not the cheesy thrillers so much as the dramas and paranormal movies that often seem intriguing, and often contain some select actor's highlights, but finally come across like, well, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Truthfully, several of these, although simpler, were more entertaining overall. Here is where I must break my personal rule, not spiritual but professional: Long ago, a respected mentor persuaded me to remove words like “boring” or “dull” from my reviewing language. Such terms express scant but a personal and broadly stated lack of patience, disengaging from the job of vividly conveying the thoughtful and feeling of viewing an individual production. It’s difficult to express boredom without seeming uninteresting personally. It's just as unclear as labeling a movie “engaging.” “Say more,” essentially.

Yet, I acknowledge, I grew weary for a large part of the film. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it is a religious style of stultification, not for this movie is moralizing, but since it demands a type of dutiful submission to watch it. After a while in the beginning, the movie locks into a monotonous pattern of ongoing suffering, and does not